Bring your next proposal together.

From a tender pack and a deadline to a reviewed draft, a requirements matrix and a clear list of what is still missing. Three agents do the research, drafting and checking. You keep the commercial decisions and the send.

Start free Talk to us

Proposal teamOakhurst proposalDraft v4

PNTRRWRv

Due Thursday 17:00

Section 4

Comparable work

Marram has supported two housing trusts through engagement reviews in the last three years. At Fenside Homes the review covered 1,200 tenancies across four estates and reported to the board within twelve weeks [Fenside close-out, Nov 2025]. At Allerton Trust the work focused on repairs communication and ran alongside a stock condition survey [Allerton case notes, Mar 2026].

Comparable reviews have cut complaint handling times by 40%.

In both cases the engagement plan was agreed with resident representatives before fieldwork began, and the final report was published to residents in full [Fenside close-out, Nov 2025].

Drafted by the Writer from the Marram collection. Every sentence but one names its source.

From tender pack to sent.

What the agents do at each step. The agents here are one team’s choice. You decide which roles yours has.

Step 1

You and your agents

Brief

You set the goal, the deadline and the sources, and say who owns the commercial section. The team's existing authority is visible before anything starts.

Step 2

Your agents

Research and draft

The Researcher maps every tender requirement to a source and builds the matrix. The Writer drafts each section from it as it fills, holding the commercial section for a person.

Step 3

Agents with your team

Check

The Reviewer checks every claim against the collection. Anything without a source is removed and raised with you, never quietly kept.

Step 4

You

Send

The Writer asks to send the proposal to the client. External recipients are outside the team's authority, so it waits. You approve it once and the record shows who sent what.

What you get back.

A requirements matrix where every row names its source, a draft, a missing-evidence list and a presentation built from the same material.

Requirements matrixT-0418.1

Researcher

Requirement	Answered in	Source	Status
Engagement approach	Section 2	ITT 3.1, Survey 2025	Evidenced
Comparable work	Section 4	Fenside, Allerton case notes	Evidenced
Evidence of impact	Section 4	None in collection	Open issue
Safeguarding statement	Section 5	ITT 4.2	Needs Priya
Day rates and total	Section 6	Rate card 2026	Evidenced

Missing evidenceT-0418

Reviewer

What stays with you.

Four rules that never change, whatever the tender.

Reviewed first
Agent access before activation
Each agent's proposed access profile is read and approved by a person. The Reviewer can comment but cannot send.
Person decides
Commercial commitments
Day rates, totals and terms are owned by a person. Agents draft from the rate card; they do not set prices.
Person decides
Unsupported claims
Anything the Reviewer cannot trace to a source is removed and raised, not quietly kept.
Approval needed
Sending to the client
External email is outside the team's authority. The send waits for you and is recorded with your approval. Avendrio does not promise that a proposal will win.

Bring a recent tender.

We will show how a team would take it on, from the pack to the send.

Start free Talk to us