Turn a question into a briefing you can use.

Three agents read only the sources you allow, cite every finding with a date, keep the disagreements visible and write the brief. You decide what the reader sees.

Start free Talk to us

Research teamEvidence briefT-0402

PNRAE

1 decision for you

The question

What does the evidence say about resident engagement in housing trusts, and where does it disagree? Reader: Oakhurst's director of housing.

FindingSource

[1]

Formal panels improve the decision record but reach few residents.

Housing Ombudsman guidanceSection 3.2 · March 2024 · PublicVerified

[2]

Residents prefer informal estate visits and short digital check-ins.

Oakhurst resident surveyQ7 and Q9 · June 2025 · CollectionVerified

[3]

Complaint volumes are a weak proxy for engagement quality.

Marram, Fenside close-outFindings, p.14 · November 2025 · CollectionVerified

[4]

The 2025 survey over-represents newer tenancies.

Kept as an uncertainty, not a finding.

Survey method noteNot in the collection. Nothing else was searched.Could not verify

Team room

Priya Nairto Researcher11:02

Why is [4] not a finding?

Researcher11:02

The survey’s method note is not in the collection, so I cannot check the sample. It stays an uncertainty until you add it.

Editorto Researcher11:05

Need the page for [3] before the brief goes out.

Researcher11:05

Page 14, November 2025. Added.

Where [1] and [2] disagree

The guidance recommends panels as the main channel. The survey suggests residents would not use them. Both stay in, with dates. The brief does not pick a winner for the client.

Your decision Waiting

Which findings go into the Oakhurst proposal. Only what you choose here can be cited by the Writer later.

Choose findings

From question to brief.

What the agents do at each step. The agents here are one team’s choice. You decide which roles yours has.

Step 1

You and your agents

Ask

You type the question and say who will read the answer. You name the collections and public sources the agents may use. Everything else is out of scope.

Step 2

Your agents

Gather

The Researcher reads the allowed sources and records each finding with a numbered citation and the source's date. Nothing without a source is kept.

Step 3

Agents together

Compare

The Analyst sets the options side by side: what the evidence says, what each costs to run, and how old the source is. Nothing is ranked without a source.

Step 4

Agents, then you

Brief

The Editor writes the brief, keeps the disagreement between sources visible and lists what remains uncertain, rather than smoothing it over.

What you get back.

A sourced brief with the disagreement kept, a comparison with dates, and slides built from the same findings.

Research teamEvidence briefT-0402

Editor, v2

Resident engagement in housing trusts: what the evidence supports

Formal resident panels improve the record of decisions but reach a small share of residents [1]. Oakhurst's own 2025 survey shows a preference for informal estate visits and short digital check-ins [2]. Complaint volumes are a weak proxy for engagement quality [3].

Where sources disagree

[1] recommends panels as the primary channel. [2] suggests residents would not use them. Both are retained; the brief does not resolve the disagreement for the client.

Uncertain

Whether the 2025 survey sample over-represents newer tenancies. The survey's method note is missing from the collection.

[1] Housing Ombudsman, engagement guidance, March 2024. [2] Oakhurst Housing Trust, Resident survey, June 2025. [3] Marram internal note, Fenside review close-out, November 2025.

ComparisonT-0402.2

Analyst

Approach	What the evidence says	Cost to run	Source, date
Formal resident panel	Strong decision record, low reach	Moderate, quarterly	[1], Mar 2024
Estate visits	Preferred by residents, weak record	Higher, staff time	[2], Jun 2025
Digital check-ins	Good reach, untested at Oakhurst	Low after set-up	[2], Jun 2025

What stays with you.

Three rules that never change, whatever the question.

Set first
Which sources are allowed
The Researcher reads only the collections and public sources you name. It cannot add a source on its own.
Kept visible
Disagreement and uncertainty
The Editor cannot resolve conflicting sources by leaving one out. Both stay in the brief, with dates.
Person decides
What the reader sees
You choose which findings go to the client. Agents do not send the brief outside the team.

Bring a question you need answered.

We will show how a research team would source and brief it from your own documents.

Start free Talk to us